<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Couch for under 4 bucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=couch-for-under-4-bucks</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ez</title>
		<link>http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4046</link>
		<dc:creator>Ez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secret.ideacog.net/?p=1161#comment-4046</guid>
		<description>The majority of people who mow &#039;get&#039; music do so illegally, which seems inevitable, but the musician should be reciprocated for creating it. 

Just like a pro skateboarder should get paid for doing something they&#039;re good at. What&#039;s weird though is that what if you&#039;re good at something that doesn&#039;t create an exchange at all? I guess the overarching point is IF you really want to get paid, it&#039;s possible to do so doing anything. Just sucks for people who are good at something but have no idea how to get paid. Lime most artists, writers, athletes, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of people who mow &#8216;get&#8217; music do so illegally, which seems inevitable, but the musician should be reciprocated for creating it. </p>
<p>Just like a pro skateboarder should get paid for doing something they&#8217;re good at. What&#8217;s weird though is that what if you&#8217;re good at something that doesn&#8217;t create an exchange at all? I guess the overarching point is IF you really want to get paid, it&#8217;s possible to do so doing anything. Just sucks for people who are good at something but have no idea how to get paid. Lime most artists, writers, athletes, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Parzybok</title>
		<link>http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Parzybok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secret.ideacog.net/?p=1161#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>Ah shucks, thanks Valerie. And thanks for joining the Grand Canyon experiment.

@Ez - I&#039;d like to see a world where writers didn&#039;t have to earn a living from their books rather than one where, for the large majority, it was near impossible to earn a living from one&#039;s books. That said, I do believe in the idea of reward -- though I think of it more as an exchange rather than a reward. 

Just as a widget maker works hard to create a widget and then bring it to market, and wants to see some reward for the enormous amount of work and time expended for the effort.

Money can be a loaded topic, but within the system we have, as a symbolic measure of work or goods, it&#039;s the best thing we&#039;ve got. 

I think it&#039;s philosophically important for a society to pay for art -- and by doing so, to indicate that they value the art. I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s necessarily philosophicaly important for an artist to be paid, but it is pragmatically important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah shucks, thanks Valerie. And thanks for joining the Grand Canyon experiment.</p>
<p>@Ez &#8211; I&#8217;d like to see a world where writers didn&#8217;t have to earn a living from their books rather than one where, for the large majority, it was near impossible to earn a living from one&#8217;s books. That said, I do believe in the idea of reward &#8212; though I think of it more as an exchange rather than a reward. </p>
<p>Just as a widget maker works hard to create a widget and then bring it to market, and wants to see some reward for the enormous amount of work and time expended for the effort.</p>
<p>Money can be a loaded topic, but within the system we have, as a symbolic measure of work or goods, it&#8217;s the best thing we&#8217;ve got. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s philosophically important for a society to pay for art &#8212; and by doing so, to indicate that they value the art. I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s necessarily philosophicaly important for an artist to be paid, but it is pragmatically important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ez</title>
		<link>http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secret.ideacog.net/?p=1161#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Makes a kindle seem cheaper. Say writers didn&#039;t have to earn a livin from their books- shouldn&#039;t their work be for free? Philosophically, what is the importance of paying for art? Purely because the artist should be rewarded? Maybe just that an artist should be able to make a living just like a taxi driver makes a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes a kindle seem cheaper. Say writers didn&#8217;t have to earn a livin from their books- shouldn&#8217;t their work be for free? Philosophically, what is the importance of paying for art? Purely because the artist should be rewarded? Maybe just that an artist should be able to make a living just like a taxi driver makes a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie in San Diego</title>
		<link>http://secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-4043</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie in San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secret.ideacog.net/?p=1161#comment-4043</guid>
		<description>Hey!  I read the blog and I bought the book.  In fact I bought many copies, so I could give them to people.

But now that you mention it, I&#039;ll try to get my friend the Kindle addict to buy himself a copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  I read the blog and I bought the book.  In fact I bought many copies, so I could give them to people.</p>
<p>But now that you mention it, I&#8217;ll try to get my friend the Kindle addict to buy himself a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  secret.ideacog.net/2010/02/18/couch-for-under-4-bucks/feed/ ) in 0.25874 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 10:08 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 11:08 pm UTC -->
